Model comparison
Llama 3.2 90B vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412
Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Meta
StepFunSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads 36.3 to 11.1.
- Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Llama 3.2 90B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 27.5 | 39.2 |
| Released | 2024-09-24 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 38.5 (#174)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1316 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 27.3% | — |
Reasoning Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 25.9 (#142)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1299 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | — |
Math Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 36.3 (#169)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1304 |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | — |
Knowledge Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 35.2 (#187)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1279 |
| MMLU | 80.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.7 (#181)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1290 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1331 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1324 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 67.9 (#192)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1287 |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#170)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1307 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.3 (#173)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1321 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1328 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1292 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.2 90B better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?
Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.