Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412
Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Google
StepFunSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads 36.3 to 9.3.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | StepFun | |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 39.2 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 38.5 (#174)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1316 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Reasoning Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 25.9 (#142)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1299 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |
Math Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 36.3 (#169)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1304 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 35.2 (#187)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1279 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.7 (#181)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1290 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1331 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1324 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | — |
Instruction Following Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 67.9 (#192)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1287 |
Long Context Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#170)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1307 |
Writing & Preference Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.3 (#173)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1321 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1328 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1292 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?
Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better for coding?
Step 2 16k Exp 202412 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.