Model comparison
Llama 3.2 90B vs Solar Pro4
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Meta
UpstageSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Solar Pro4 leads 38.8 to 11.1.
- Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Llama 3.2 90B | Solar Pro4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 27.5 | 42.1 |
| Released | 2024-09-24 | 2026-08-06 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 524K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1437 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80), Solar Pro4: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 27.3% | — |
Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1399 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | — |
Math Solar Pro4 leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1416 |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | — |
Knowledge Solar Pro4 leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274), Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1427 |
| MMLU | 80.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124), Solar Pro4: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1415 |
| LMArena French | — | 1397 |
| LMArena German | — | 1364 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1382 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1401 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1377 |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1381 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1316 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1385 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.2 90B better than Solar Pro4?
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and Solar Pro4 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.