Model comparison
Llama 3.2 90B vs Longcat Flash Chat
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 39.4 to 11.1.
Side by side
| Llama 3.2 90B | Longcat Flash Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Meituan |
| Noometry Index | 27.5 | 42.1 |
| Released | 2024-09-24 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1471 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80), Longcat Flash Chat: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 27.3% | — |
Reasoning Llama 3.2 90B leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217), Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 43.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 17.7% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1440 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | — |
Math Longcat Flash Chat leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308), Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1442 |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | — |
Knowledge Longcat Flash Chat leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274), Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1454 |
| MMLU | 80.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124), Longcat Flash Chat: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1465 |
| LMArena French | — | 1456 |
| LMArena German | — | 1408 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1373 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1371 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1445 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1411 |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1425 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1427 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1418 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.2 90B better than Longcat Flash Chat?
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and Longcat Flash Chat share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Longcat Flash Chat has 19.