Model comparison

Llama 3.2 90B vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.2 90B Meta

27.5

Rank #331 Confirmed

Qwen3.6 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

51.5

Rank #43 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 90B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Max Preview in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads 54.1 to 11.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 2.6% for Llama 3.2 90B and 91.1% for Qwen3.6 Max Preview.
  • Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 3.2 90B and Qwen3.6 Max Preview specifications
Llama 3.2 90BQwen3.6 Max Preview
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index27.551.5
Released2024-09-242026-04-20
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.30
Output $ / M tokens—$7.80
Results tracked929

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 48.7 (#54)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BQwen3.6 Max Preview
SWE-bench Verified—76.7%
LMArena WebDev—1482
LMArena Coding—1471

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BQwen3.6 Max Preview
BALROG27.3%—
Vending-Bench 2—4,254

Reasoning Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 41.7 (#53)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BQwen3.6 Max Preview
Epoch Capabilities Index125.5149.24
SimpleBench—63%
NYT Connections (extended)—74.1%
Chess Puzzles—20%
EnigmaEval0.4%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1457
Mystery Game Puzzles—19%
DTBench—87.2%
LMCA—42.5%

Math Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.1 (#46)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BQwen3.6 Max Preview
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.6%91.1%
LMArena Math—1465
MATH Level 539.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—23.1%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—4.2%

Knowledge Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 57.6 (#39)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BQwen3.6 Max Preview
GPQA Diamond41%87.4%
SimpleQA Verified—52%
LMArena Expert—1478
MMLU80.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Vision1000—
GeoBench52%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.2 (#48)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Non-English—1437
LMArena Chinese—1487
LMArena French—1449
LMArena Russian—1445
LMArena Spanish—1454

Instruction Following Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 75.7 (#55)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Instruction Following—1438

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 44.6 (#61)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Longer Query—1457

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 63.8 (#60)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Text—1447
LMArena Creative Writing—1435
LMArena Multi-Turn—1456

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.2 90B better than Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and Qwen3.6 Max Preview share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Max Preview has 29.

Related comparisons

Go deeper