Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.1 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 1.0 Pro Google

27.1

Rank #327 Confirmed

Qwen3.6 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

51.1

Rank #36 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Max Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads 52.2 to 8.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 91.1% for Qwen3.6 Max Preview.

Side by side

Gemini 1.0 ProQwen3.6 Max Preview
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index27.151.1
Released2023-12-132026-04-20
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.30
Output $ / M tokens—$7.80
Results tracked2429

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 48.6 (#50)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Coding11081472
SWE-bench Verified—76.7%
LMArena WebDev—1482
HumanEval+55.5%—
MBPP+61.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3.6 Max Preview
Vending-Bench 2—4,254

Reasoning Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 40.8 (#47)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts11091457
DTBench45.9%87.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index116.97149.27
SimpleBench—63%
NYT Connections (extended)—74.1%
Chess Puzzles—20%
Mystery Game Puzzles—19%
LMCA—42.5%

Math Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 52.2 (#40)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3.6 Max Preview
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%91.1%
LMArena Math11321465
MATH Level 511.2%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—23.1%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—4.2%

Knowledge Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 57.6 (#35)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3.6 Max Preview
GPQA Diamond34%87.4%
LMArena Expert10591476
SimpleQA Verified—52%
MMLU70%—

Multilingual Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.3 (#46)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Non-English11381436
LMArena Chinese11241487
LMArena French11441449
LMArena Russian11861444
LMArena Spanish11181452
LMArena German1125—
LMArena Japanese1023—

Instruction Following Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 75.8 (#51)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Instruction Following11141437

Long Context Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 44.6 (#59)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Longer Query11321457

Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 64.0 (#58)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Text11491447
LMArena Creative Writing11301435
LMArena Multi-Turn11391456

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.1 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Qwen3.6 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Qwen3.6 Max Preview share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Max Preview has 29.

Related comparisons

Go deeper