Model comparison

Llama 3.2 90B vs Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.2 90B Meta

27.5

Rank #331 Confirmed

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct Microsoft

29.3

Rank #314 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Llama 3.2 90B scores higher in 1 category and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads 27.6 to 11.1.

Side by side

Llama 3.2 90B and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct specifications
Llama 3.2 90BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
ProviderMetaMicrosoft
Noometry Index27.529.3
Released2024-09-242024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked932

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.9 (#318)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LiveBench Coding—20.3%
LMArena Coding—1101

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
BALROG27.3%—

Reasoning Llama 3.2 90B leads

Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.8 (#323)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
EnigmaEval0.4%—
LiveBench Reasoning—15.9%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1100
LiveBench Data Analysis—30.3%
Adversarial NLI—58.1%
BIG-Bench Hard—79.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index125.5—
HellaSwag—77%
LiveBench—24%
WinoGrande—81.5%

Math Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads

Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.6 (#248)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.6%—
LiveBench Math—17.6%
LMArena Math—1151
MATH Level 539.4%—

Knowledge Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads

Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 29.1 (#240)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
MMLU80.3%75.7%
GPQA Diamond41%—
LMArena Expert—1067
ARC (AI2) Challenge—90.7%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—58.1%

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Vision1000—
GeoBench52%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#272)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1058
LMArena Chinese—1061
LMArena French—1135
LMArena German—1080
LMArena Japanese—966
LMArena Korean—894
LMArena Russian—1111
LMArena Spanish—1111

Instruction Following Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 51.9 (#292)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LiveBench Instruction Following—47.2%
LMArena Instruction Following—1087

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#267)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—1088

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.1 (#284)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Text—1110
LMArena Creative Writing—1083
LMArena Multi-Turn—1068
LiveBench Language—12.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.2 90B better than Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct?

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper