Model comparison
Llama 3.2 90B vs o3-pro
o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Llama 3.2 90B scores higher in 0 categories and o3-pro in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where o3-pro leads 29.5 to 21.7.
- Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Llama 3.2 90B | o3-pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 27.5 | 42.9 |
| Released | 2024-09-24 | 2025-06-10 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $80 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, o3-pro: 55.5 (#24)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 84.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 58.2% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 27.3% | — |
Reasoning o3-pro leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217), o3-pro: 23.8 (#171)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | 147.42 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 4.9% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 59.3% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| DTBench | — | 86.9% |
| LMCA | — | 38.5% |
Math Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | — |
Knowledge o3-pro leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274), o3-pro: 29.5 (#238)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | — |
| Confabulations | — | 14.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.3% |
| MMLU | 80.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, o3-pro: 72.2 (#1)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 97.2% |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, o3-pro: 57.1 (#133)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 84.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.2 90B better than o3-pro?
o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and o3-pro share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and o3-pro has 12.