Model comparison
Llama 3.2 90B vs MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Llama 3.2 90B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 35.4 to 10.4.
Side by side
| Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 43.0 |
| Released | 2024-09-24 | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, MiMo-V2.5: 43.6 (#75)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1438 |
| SciCode | — | 43.1% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1469 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 513.95 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 29.7 (#73), MiMo-V2.5: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 27.3% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5 leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 20.9 (#207), MiMo-V2.5: 27.8 (#98)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1450 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | — |
Math MiMo-V2.5 leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 10.4 (#302), MiMo-V2.5: 35.4 (#145)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 16% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1436 |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5 leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#269), MiMo-V2.5: 40.2 (#109)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1459 |
| MMLU | 80.3% | — |
Multimodal MiMo-V2.5 leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 24.9 (#119), MiMo-V2.5: 39.0 (#53)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | 1245 |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, MiMo-V2.5: 52.0 (#96)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1467 |
| LMArena French | — | 1447 |
| LMArena German | — | 1421 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1304 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1363 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1412 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, MiMo-V2.5: 75.7 (#55)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1433 |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, MiMo-V2.5: 44.1 (#69)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1444 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, MiMo-V2.5: 61.8 (#82)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1427 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1445 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.2 90B better than MiMo-V2.5?
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and MiMo-V2.5 share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5 has 23.