Model comparison

Llama 3.2 90B vs Llama 3-8B

Llama 3.2 90B is the stronger model overall, scoring 27.1 to 25.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.2 90B Meta

27.1

Rank #326 Confirmed

Llama 3-8B Meta

25.3

Rank #338 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 90B scores higher in 3 categories and Llama 3-8B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Llama 3.2 90B leads 21.7 to 7.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 39.4% for Llama 3.2 90B and 6.1% for Llama 3-8B.

Side by side

Llama 3.2 90B and Llama 3-8B specifications
Llama 3.2 90BLlama 3-8B
ProviderMetaMeta
Noometry Index27.125.3
Released2024-09-242024-04-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—8K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.14
Results tracked934

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Llama 3-8B: 30.5 (#285)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BLlama 3-8B
BigCodeBench Instruct—31.9%
LMArena Coding—1152
BigCodeBench Complete—36.9%
HumanEval+—56.7%
MBPP+—54.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: 29.7 (#73), Llama 3-8B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BLlama 3-8B
BALROG27.3%—

Reasoning Llama 3.2 90B leads

Llama 3.2 90B: 20.9 (#207), Llama 3-8B: 13.8 (#321)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BLlama 3-8B
Epoch Capabilities Index125.5116.33
Chess Puzzles—0%
EnigmaEval0.4%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1133
DTBench—43.9%
Adversarial NLI—57.3%
ForecastBench—58.6
WinoGrande—75.7%

Math Llama 3.2 90B leads

Llama 3.2 90B: 10.4 (#302), Llama 3-8B: 8.3 (#317)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BLlama 3-8B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.6%1.9%
MATH Level 539.4%6.1%
LMArena Math—1151

Knowledge Llama 3.2 90B leads

Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#269), Llama 3-8B: 7.8 (#303)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BLlama 3-8B
GPQA Diamond41%26.1%
MMLU80.3%68.8%
LMArena Expert—1113
ARC (AI2) Challenge—82.8%
OpenBookQA—82.6%
TriviaQA—67.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: 24.9 (#119), Llama 3-8B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BLlama 3-8B
LMArena Vision1000—
GeoBench52%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Llama 3-8B: 31.0 (#256)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BLlama 3-8B
LMArena Non-English—1098
LMArena Chinese—1076
LMArena French—1158
LMArena German—1104
LMArena Japanese—967
LMArena Korean—1003
LMArena Russian—1109
LMArena Spanish—1172

Instruction Following Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Llama 3-8B: 58.7 (#255)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BLlama 3-8B
LMArena Instruction Following—1127

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Llama 3-8B: 34.2 (#246)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BLlama 3-8B
LMArena Longer Query—1128

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Llama 3.2 90B: —, Llama 3-8B: 37.7 (#251)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 90BLlama 3-8B
LMArena Text—1166
LMArena Creative Writing—1150
LMArena Multi-Turn—1152

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.2 90B better than Llama 3-8B?

Llama 3.2 90B is the stronger model overall, scoring 27.1 to 25.3 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and Llama 3-8B share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-8B has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper