Model comparison
Dolly 2.0-12b vs Llama 3.2 90B
Llama 3.2 90B is the stronger model overall, scoring 27.1 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Databricks
MetaSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 1 category and Llama 3.2 90B in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Dolly 2.0-12b leads 25.0 to 10.4.
Side by side
| Dolly 2.0-12b | Llama 3.2 90B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2023-04-11 | 2024-09-24 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.0 (#327), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 29.7 (#73)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 27.3% |
Reasoning Llama 3.2 90B leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 14.6 (#315), Llama 3.2 90B: 20.9 (#207)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 88.94 | 125.5 |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | — |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |
Math Dolly 2.0-12b leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 25.0 (#250), Llama 3.2 90B: 10.4 (#302)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.6% |
| LMArena Math | 871 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.4% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#269)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 26.2% | 80.3% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 24.9 (#119)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1000 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#291), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.9 (#299), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#306), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Llama 3.2 90B?
Llama 3.2 90B is the stronger model overall, scoring 27.1 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Llama 3.2 90B share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.