Model comparison

Claude 3 Sonnet vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B

Claude 3 Sonnet and OLMo 2 Furious 13B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.0 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Sonnet Anthropic

29.0

Rank #319 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads 23.1 to 10.7.
  • OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 Sonnet and OLMo 2 Furious 13B specifications
Claude 3 SonnetOLMo 2 Furious 13B
ProviderAnthropicAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index29.029.7
Released2024-02-292024-12-31
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3012

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude 3 Sonnet leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 29.6 (#302), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetOLMo 2 Furious 13B
WeirdML10.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct42.7%—
LiveBench Coding—10.4%
LMArena Coding1223—
BigCodeBench Complete53.8%—
HumanEval+64%—
MBPP+69.3%—

Reasoning Claude 3 Sonnet leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 20.5 (#237), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LiveBench Reasoning—16.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1197—
DTBench53.6%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—20.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index120.7—
LiveBench—22.1%
WinoGrande75.1%—

Math OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 10.7 (#310), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetOLMo 2 Furious 13B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%—
Omni-MATH—15.6%
LiveBench Math—13.6%
LMArena Math1213—
MATH Level 518.2%—

Knowledge Claude 3 Sonnet leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 21.1 (#276), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetOLMo 2 Furious 13B
GPQA Diamond40.6%—
MMLU-Pro—31%
GPQA (HELM)—31.6%
LMArena Expert1173—
MMLU75.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 25.2 (#125), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Vision984—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 37.8 (#234), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Non-English1205—
LMArena Chinese1189—
LMArena French1229—
LMArena German1204—
LMArena Japanese1131—
LMArena Korean1128—
LMArena Russian1227—
LMArena Spanish1204—

Instruction Following Claude 3 Sonnet leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 62.8 (#235), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LiveBench Instruction Following—60.6%
IFEval—73%
LMArena Instruction Following1199—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 36.7 (#228), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Longer Query1211—

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Claude 3 Sonnet: 42.1 (#238), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Text1218—
LMArena Creative Writing1186—
WildBench—68.9%
LMArena Multi-Turn1227—
LiveBench Language—11.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Sonnet better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?

Claude 3 Sonnet and OLMo 2 Furious 13B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.0 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Claude 3 Sonnet or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?

Claude 3 Sonnet scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.6 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Sonnet and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Sonnet has 30 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper