Model comparison

Llama 3.2 3B vs MiniMax-M2.7

MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 28.4 on the Noometry Index. Llama 3.2 3B costs 4.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiniMax-M2.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.2 3B Meta

28.4

Rank #318 Confirmed

MiniMax-M2.7 MiniMax

37.4

Rank #188 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 3B scores higher in 2 categories and MiniMax-M2.7 in 7 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2.7 leads 59.1 to 24.9.
  • Llama 3.2 3B is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.33 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for MiniMax-M2.7.
  • MiniMax-M2.7 accepts more context: 205K tokens versus 131K.

Side by side

Llama 3.2 3B and MiniMax-M2.7 specifications
Llama 3.2 3BMiniMax-M2.7
ProviderMetaMiniMax
Noometry Index28.437.4
Released2024-09-242026-03-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K205K
Max output118K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.05$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$0.33$1.20
Results tracked1830

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Llama 3.2 3B: 27.1 (#314), MiniMax-M2.7: 41.4 (#115)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3BMiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Coding10981454
LMArena WebDev—1397
SciCode—47%
WeirdML—37%
BigCodeBench Instruct23.4%—
BigCodeBench Complete28.3%—
ALE-Bench—599.25

Agentic & Tool Use MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Llama 3.2 3B: 19.9 (#135), MiniMax-M2.7: 24.9 (#103)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3BMiniMax-M2.7
Terminal-Bench—45.1%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard21.9%—
BALROG10.1%—
ExploitBench—13.3%
GBAEval—0%

Reasoning Llama 3.2 3B leads

Llama 3.2 3B: 20.1 (#225), MiniMax-M2.7: 19.0 (#248)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3BMiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Hard Prompts10951422
NYT Connections (extended)—24.7%
CritPt—0.6%
Thematic Generalization—39.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—145.84

Math Llama 3.2 3B leads

Llama 3.2 3B: 29.9 (#213), MiniMax-M2.7: 24.9 (#254)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3BMiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Math11261420
ProofBench—3%

Knowledge MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Llama 3.2 3B: 29.1 (#232), MiniMax-M2.7: 37.1 (#151)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3BMiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Expert10901443
Vectara Hallucination Rate—12.9%

Multilingual MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Llama 3.2 3B: 26.4 (#276), MiniMax-M2.7: 50.5 (#120)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3BMiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Non-English10191382
LMArena Chinese10171439
LMArena German10561398
LMArena Russian9491383
LMArena French—1422
LMArena Japanese—1261
LMArena Korean—1313
LMArena Spanish—1403

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Llama 3.2 3B: 56.3 (#270), MiniMax-M2.7: 74.2 (#101)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3BMiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Instruction Following10891404

Long Context MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Llama 3.2 3B: 33.4 (#256), MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#94)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3BMiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Longer Query11011419

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Llama 3.2 3B: 24.9 (#302), MiniMax-M2.7: 59.1 (#107)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 3BMiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Text11101404
LMArena Creative Writing10941354
LMArena Multi-Turn11051413
EQ-Bench Creative Writing595—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.2 3B better than MiniMax-M2.7?

MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 28.4 on the Noometry Index. Llama 3.2 3B costs 4.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiniMax-M2.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.2 3B or MiniMax-M2.7?

Llama 3.2 3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.33 per million output tokens; MiniMax-M2.7 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.

Is Llama 3.2 3B or MiniMax-M2.7 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.4 versus 27.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiniMax-M2.7 does, with 205K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 3B and MiniMax-M2.7 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 3B has 18 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.7 has 30.

Related comparisons

Go deeper