Model comparison

Llama 3.2 1B vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.3 to 19.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.2 1B Meta

19.9

Rank #349 Confirmed

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.3

Rank #218 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 1B scores higher in 0 categories and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads 31.4 to 7.2.

Side by side

Llama 3.2 1B and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct specifications
Llama 3.2 1BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
ProviderMetaNVIDIA
Noometry Index19.935.3
Released2024-09-242024-06-14
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window60K—
Max output54K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.027—
Output $ / M tokens$0.20—
Results tracked2217

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Llama 3.2 1B: 20.6 (#333), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.6 (#223)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 1BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Coding10711209
BigCodeBench Instruct8.2%—
BigCodeBench Complete11.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3.2 1B: 14.5 (#142), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 1BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard10.8%—
BALROG6.6%—

Reasoning Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Llama 3.2 1B: 15.6 (#304), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 22.4 (#180)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 1BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10441202
Chess Puzzles0%—
Epoch Capabilities Index101.95—

Math Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Llama 3.2 1B: 9.7 (#308), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.7 (#193)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 1BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Math10861216
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250.6%—

Knowledge Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Llama 3.2 1B: 7.2 (#307), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.4 (#212)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 1BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Expert10071171
GPQA Diamond23.9%—

Multilingual Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Llama 3.2 1B: 23.9 (#287), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 38.0 (#228)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 1BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Non-English9731206
LMArena Chinese9581214
LMArena German10141192
LMArena Russian9411219
LMArena French—1196
LMArena Japanese—1128
LMArena Korean—1148
LMArena Spanish—1195

Instruction Following Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Llama 3.2 1B: 52.6 (#285), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.3 (#227)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 1BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10311203

Long Context Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Llama 3.2 1B: 31.9 (#269), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#216)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 1BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query10501225

Writing & Preference Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Llama 3.2 1B: 21.4 (#305), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.9 (#229)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.2 1BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Text10551225
LMArena Creative Writing10331203
LMArena Multi-Turn10301214
EQ-Bench Creative Writing200—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.2 1B better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.3 to 19.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3.2 1B or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better for coding?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.6 versus 20.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 1B and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 1B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper