Model comparison

Llama 3.1-8B vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.3 to 22.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.1-8B Meta

22.8

Rank #347 Confirmed

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.3

Rank #218 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1-8B scores higher in 0 categories and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads 31.4 to 8.0.

Side by side

Llama 3.1-8B and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct specifications
Llama 3.1-8BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
ProviderMetaNVIDIA
Noometry Index22.835.3
Released2024-07-232024-06-14
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.05—
Output $ / M tokens$0.08—
Results tracked4317

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1-8B: 19.9 (#335), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.6 (#223)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-8BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Coding11951209
SciCode13.2%—
WeirdML1.7%—
BigCodeBench Instruct32.8%—
BigCodeBench Complete40.5%—
HumanEval+62.8%—
MBPP+55.6%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3.1-8B: 22.3 (#123), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-8BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard25.8%—
BALROG15.1%—

Reasoning Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1-8B: 14.5 (#316), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 22.4 (#180)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-8BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts11751202
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles0%—
DTBench50.9%—
LMCA5.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index116.48—
PIQA81.2%—

Math Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1-8B: 9.5 (#311), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.7 (#193)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-8BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Math11791216
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.7%—
Omni-MATH13.7%—
MATH Level 522.9%—
GSM8K82.4%—

Knowledge Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1-8B: 8.0 (#302), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.4 (#212)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-8BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Expert11441171
GPQA Diamond27%—
MMLU-Pro40.6%—
GPQA (HELM)24.7%—
BoolQ82.8%—
MMLU56.1%—

Multilingual Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1-8B: 34.2 (#244), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 38.0 (#228)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-8BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Non-English11481206
LMArena Chinese11511214
LMArena French11761196
LMArena German11441192
LMArena Japanese10611128
LMArena Korean10531148
LMArena Russian11581219
LMArena Spanish11691195

Instruction Following Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1-8B: 59.1 (#253), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.3 (#227)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-8BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following11591203
IFEval74.3%—

Long Context Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1-8B: 35.8 (#233), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#216)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-8BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query11821225

Writing & Preference Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1-8B: 29.9 (#285), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.9 (#229)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-8BNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Text11871225
LMArena Creative Writing11541203
LMArena Multi-Turn11721214
EQ-Bench Creative Writing713—
WildBench68.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.1-8B better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.3 to 22.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3.1-8B or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better for coding?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.6 versus 19.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1-8B and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1-8B has 43 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper