Model comparison

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 vs Qwen1.5-72B

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Qwen1.5-72B Alibaba (Qwen)

30.8

Rank #285 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen1.5-72B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads 52.2 to 37.3.

Side by side

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 and Qwen1.5-72B specifications
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen1.5-72B
ProviderNVIDIAAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index36.730.8
Released—2024-02-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1122

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 38.4 (#177), Qwen1.5-72B: 31.9 (#277)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Coding13121165
BigCodeBench Instruct—33.2%
BigCodeBench Complete—40.3%
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—61.6%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 15.7 (#149), Qwen1.5-72B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen1.5-72B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard10%—

Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 26.3 (#134), Qwen1.5-72B: 22.2 (#203)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Hard Prompts13161148

Math Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 37.5 (#152), Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#205)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Math13601164

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: —, Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#300)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen1.5-72B
GPQA Diamond—28.8%
LMArena Expert—1136

Multilingual Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 43.1 (#187), Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#253)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Non-English12821135
LMArena Russian12841104
LMArena Chinese—1186
LMArena French—1159
LMArena German—1084
LMArena Japanese—1061
LMArena Korean—1050
LMArena Spanish—1110

Instruction Following Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 69.0 (#178), Qwen1.5-72B: 59.3 (#256)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Instruction Following13081141

Long Context Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 39.5 (#177), Qwen1.5-72B: 35.1 (#243)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Longer Query12991157

Writing & Preference Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 52.2 (#175), Qwen1.5-72B: 37.3 (#258)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1Qwen1.5-72B
LMArena Text13201166
LMArena Creative Writing13141137
LMArena Multi-Turn13171160

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 better than Qwen1.5-72B?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 or Qwen1.5-72B better for coding?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 and Qwen1.5-72B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-72B has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper