Model comparison

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct IBM

30.8

Rank #286 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads 52.2 to 29.6.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 specifications
Granite 3.0 2b InstructLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1
ProviderIBMNVIDIA
Noometry Index30.836.7
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1311

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.3 (#316), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 38.4 (#177)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1
LMArena Coding10901312
BigCodeBench Instruct20.5%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 15.7 (#149)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—10%

Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 20.5 (#235), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 26.3 (#134)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1
LMArena Hard Prompts10731316

Math Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.2 (#217), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 37.5 (#152)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1
LMArena Math11171360

Knowledge Not comparable

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.0 (#241), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1
LMArena Expert1064—

Multilingual Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.0 (#278), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 43.1 (#187)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1
LMArena Non-English10331282
LMArena Russian10451284
LMArena Chinese1070—

Instruction Following Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 53.9 (#284), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 69.0 (#178)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1
LMArena Instruction Following10561308

Long Context Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#268), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 39.5 (#177)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1
LMArena Longer Query10701299

Writing & Preference Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.6 (#292), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 52.2 (#175)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1
LMArena Text10801320
LMArena Creative Writing10461314
LMArena Multi-Turn10531317

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct or Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 better for coding?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 28.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper