Model comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 scores higher in 4 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
Side by side
| Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 39.4 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 11 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 38.4 (#177), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1312 | 1347 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 15.7 (#149), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 10% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 26.3 (#134), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1316 | 1322 |
Math Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 37.5 (#152), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1360 | 1305 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1308 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 43.1 (#187), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1282 | 1275 |
| LMArena Russian | 1284 | 1268 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1304 |
| LMArena French | — | 1328 |
| LMArena German | — | 1282 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1336 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 69.0 (#178), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1308 | 1299 |
Long Context Too close to call
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 39.5 (#177), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1299 | 1312 |
Writing & Preference Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 52.2 (#175), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1320 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1314 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1317 | 1309 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 38.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.