Model comparison

Grok 4 Fast vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1

Grok 4 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4 Fast xAI

39.4

Rank #167 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4 Fast scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4 Fast leads 63.2 to 39.5.
  • Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4 Fast and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 specifications
Grok 4 FastLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1
ProviderxAINVIDIA
Noometry Index39.436.7
Released2025-09-19—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3011

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

Grok 4 Fast: 32.5 (#271), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 38.4 (#177)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1
LMArena Coding14291312
LMArena WebDev1159—
WeirdML42.9%—

Agentic & Tool Use Grok 4 Fast leads

Grok 4 Fast: 29.5 (#86), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 15.7 (#149)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—10%
τ²-bench Banking15.7%—
Cybench30%—
LMArena Search1171—

Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads

Grok 4 Fast: 22.2 (#201), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 26.3 (#134)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1
LMArena Hard Prompts14121316
ARC-AGI-25.3%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark66.1%—
ARC-AGI-148.5%—
DTBench82.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index144.2—
ForecastBench60.5—

Math Grok 4 Fast leads

Grok 4 Fast: 38.9 (#123), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 37.5 (#152)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1
LMArena Math14191360

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok 4 Fast: 32.0 (#214), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1
Vectara Hallucination Rate19.7%—
LMArena Expert1411—

Multilingual Grok 4 Fast leads

Grok 4 Fast: 51.3 (#111), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 43.1 (#187)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1
LMArena Non-English13961282
LMArena Russian13891284
LMArena Chinese1457—
LMArena French1431—
LMArena German1383—
LMArena Japanese1352—
LMArena Korean1357—
LMArena Spanish1415—

Instruction Following Grok 4 Fast leads

Grok 4 Fast: 73.2 (#121), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 69.0 (#178)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1
LMArena Instruction Following13871308

Long Context Grok 4 Fast leads

Grok 4 Fast: 63.2 (#3), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 39.5 (#177)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1
LMArena Longer Query14151299
Fiction.LiveBench94.4%—

Writing & Preference Grok 4 Fast leads

Grok 4 Fast: 60.0 (#102), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 52.2 (#175)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1
LMArena Text14071320
LMArena Creative Writing13871314
LMArena Multi-Turn14141317

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4 Fast better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1?

Grok 4 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4 Fast or Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 better for coding?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 32.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4 Fast and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4 Fast has 30 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper