Model comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct vs Phi-4 Mini
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads 33.5 to 24.8.
Side by side
| Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Phi-4 Mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 37.0 | 30.4 |
| Released | 2024-12-18 | 2024-12-11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.075 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.3 (#212), Phi-4 Mini: 27.6 (#312)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 10.8% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 38.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1272 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 48.2% | — |
Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 24.0 (#156), Phi-4 Mini: 21.7 (#190)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1266 | — |
Math Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 32.9 (#182), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1271 | — |
Knowledge Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 33.5 (#194), Phi-4 Mini: 24.8 (#261)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1242 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 40.7 (#212), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1245 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1263 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 66.2 (#208), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1252 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 37.5 (#210), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1239 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 48.6 (#197), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1269 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct better than Phi-4 Mini?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct or Phi-4 Mini better for coding?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.3 versus 27.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct and Phi-4 Mini share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 Mini has 3.