Model comparison
Amazon Nova Pro vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Pro scores higher in 1 category and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct in 7 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads 35.5 to 28.5.
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 37.6 |
| Released | 2024-12-03 | 2024-12-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 300K | — |
| Max output | 10K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.80 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 38 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Amazon Nova Pro: 35.1 (#229), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.9 (#216)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1272 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 38.7% |
| LiveBench Coding | 38.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.2% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 16.7 (#147), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 25% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 1.7% | — |
Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 20.0 (#243), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 25.0 (#152)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1246 | 1266 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 32.6% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 48.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 123.8 | — |
| LiveBench | 43.5% | — |
Math Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 28.5 (#243), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.5 (#182)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1252 | 1271 |
| Omni-MATH | 24.2% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 38% | — |
Knowledge Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 27.4 (#250), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 34.1 (#199)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1211 | 1242 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.4% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 67.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 30.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.1% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 44.6% | — |
| MMLU | 82% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 25.0 (#126), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 980 | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Amazon Nova Pro: 39.7 (#223), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 40.5 (#217)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1234 | 1245 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1244 | 1263 |
| LMArena Russian | 1240 | 1227 |
| LMArena French | 1271 | — |
| LMArena German | 1243 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1200 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1203 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1182 | — |
Instruction Following Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 64.9 (#226), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 65.9 (#213)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1235 | 1252 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 67.1% | — |
| IFEval | 81.5% | — |
Long Context Too close to call
Amazon Nova Pro: 38.1 (#205), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#215)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1255 | 1238 |
Writing & Preference Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 43.9 (#226), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 48.4 (#203)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1259 | 1283 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1212 | 1269 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1246 | 1275 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 60.5% | — |
| WildBench | 77.7% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 37% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Pro better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Pro or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (35.1 vs 35.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Pro and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Pro has 38 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct has 14.