Model comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct vs Muse Glimmer
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
MetaSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Glimmer in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Muse Glimmer leads 50.5 to 40.5.
Side by side
| Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 37.6 | 41.7 |
| Released | 2024-12-18 | 2026-08-10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.9 (#216), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1272 | 1416 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| SciCode | — | 44.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 38.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 48.2% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 25.0 (#152), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1266 | 1396 |
| CritPt | — | 2.6% |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.5 (#182), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1271 | 1417 |
Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 34.1 (#199), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1242 | 1386 |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 40.5 (#217), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1245 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1263 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1390 |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 65.9 (#213), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1252 | 1375 |
Long Context Muse Glimmer leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#215), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1238 | 1382 |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 48.4 (#203), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1283 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1269 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1399 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct better than Muse Glimmer?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 35.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct and Muse Glimmer share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.