Model comparison
Hunyuan Large Vision vs Muse Glimmer
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
MetaSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Glimmer in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Glimmer leads 57.7 to 46.7.
- Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Large Vision | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 37.0 | 41.3 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 37.6 (#176), Muse Glimmer: 38.7 (#157)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1307 | 1417 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 23.8 (#160), Muse Glimmer: 27.2 (#111)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1257 | 1395 |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 32.8 (#184), Muse Glimmer: 36.1 (#128)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1269 | 1419 |
Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 33.7 (#191), Muse Glimmer: 37.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1250 | 1388 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.1 (#79), Muse Glimmer: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | — |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 40.1 (#216), Muse Glimmer: 50.6 (#117)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1236 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1289 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1243 | 1393 |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 66.0 (#210), Muse Glimmer: 72.7 (#134)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1250 | 1374 |
Long Context Muse Glimmer leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.8 (#184), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#124)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1279 | 1381 |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.7 (#211), Muse Glimmer: 57.7 (#122)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1263 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1250 | 1338 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1253 | 1398 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Large Vision better than Muse Glimmer?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Large Vision or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large Vision and Muse Glimmer share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large Vision has 13 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 13.