Model comparison

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct vs Llama 3.2 90B

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.2 90B Meta

27.5

Rank #331 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads 35.5 to 11.1.

Side by side

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct and Llama 3.2 90B specifications
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b InstructLlama 3.2 90B
ProviderNVIDIAMeta
Noometry Index37.627.5
Released2024-12-182024-09-24
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked149

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.9 (#216), Llama 3.2 90B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b InstructLlama 3.2 90B
BigCodeBench Instruct38.7%—
LMArena Coding1272—
BigCodeBench Complete48.2%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b InstructLlama 3.2 90B
BALROG—27.3%

Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 25.0 (#152), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b InstructLlama 3.2 90B
EnigmaEval—0.4%
LMArena Hard Prompts1266—
Epoch Capabilities Index—125.5

Math Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.5 (#182), Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b InstructLlama 3.2 90B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—2.6%
LMArena Math1271—
MATH Level 5—39.4%

Knowledge Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 34.1 (#199), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b InstructLlama 3.2 90B
GPQA Diamond—41%
LMArena Expert1242—
MMLU—80.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b InstructLlama 3.2 90B
LMArena Vision—1000
GeoBench—52%

Multilingual Not comparable

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 40.5 (#217), Llama 3.2 90B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b InstructLlama 3.2 90B
LMArena Non-English1245—
LMArena Chinese1263—
LMArena Russian1227—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 65.9 (#213), Llama 3.2 90B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b InstructLlama 3.2 90B
LMArena Instruction Following1252—

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#215), Llama 3.2 90B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b InstructLlama 3.2 90B
LMArena Longer Query1238—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 48.4 (#203), Llama 3.2 90B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b InstructLlama 3.2 90B
LMArena Text1283—
LMArena Creative Writing1269—
LMArena Multi-Turn1275—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct better than Llama 3.2 90B?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct and Llama 3.2 90B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper