Model comparison
Hunyuan Large Vision vs Llama 3.2 90B
Hunyuan Large Vision is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher in 4 categories and Llama 3.2 90B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Large Vision leads 35.5 to 11.1.
- Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Large Vision | Llama 3.2 90B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 37.6 | 27.5 |
| Released | — | 2024-09-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1308 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan Large Vision: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 27.3% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1257 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.5 |
Math Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183), Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1268 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.4% |
Knowledge Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41% |
| LMArena Expert | 1252 | — |
| MMLU | — | 80.3% |
Multimodal Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83), Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | 1000 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1236 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1243 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1251 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1280 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1263 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1248 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1254 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Large Vision better than Llama 3.2 90B?
Hunyuan Large Vision is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large Vision and Llama 3.2 90B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Hunyuan Large Vision has 13 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.