Model comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct vs Step 3.7 Flash
Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
StepFunSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Step 3.7 Flash leads 42.9 to 34.6.
Side by side
| Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Step 3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 37.3 |
| Released | — | 2026-05-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.18 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.11 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 3.7 Flash leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 35.6 (#222), Step 3.7 Flash: 40.0 (#150)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 40% |
| LMArena Coding | 1223 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 694.12 |
Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 23.5 (#177), Step 3.7 Flash: 21.6 (#219)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 39.7% |
| CritPt | — | 2.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1203 | — |
Math Step 3.7 Flash leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 34.6 (#193), Step 3.7 Flash: 42.9 (#82)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 68.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1230 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 31.9 (#218), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1167 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.1 (#241), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1181 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1180 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1187 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 62.9 (#233), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1201 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.5 (#230), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1205 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 43.4 (#229), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1228 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1213 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1227 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct better than Step 3.7 Flash?
Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?
Step 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 35.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct and Step 3.7 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.