Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Google
NVIDIASummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 7 categories and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 43.4 to 36.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 35.9 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 35.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1223 |
Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 23.5 (#177)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1203 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
Math Too close to call
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 34.6 (#193)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1230 |
Knowledge Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 31.9 (#218)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1167 |
Multilingual Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.1 (#241)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1181 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1180 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1187 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |
Instruction Following Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 62.9 (#233)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1201 |
Long Context Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.5 (#230)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1205 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 43.4 (#229)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1228 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1213 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1227 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct?
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct better for coding?
Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 35.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has 12.