Noometry

Model comparison

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct NVIDIA

35.2

Rank #219 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct Microsoft

29.1

Rank #303 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads 43.5 to 27.3.

Side by side

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
ProviderNVIDIAMicrosoft
Noometry Index35.229.1
Released—2024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1219

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 35.0 (#219), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.3 (#307)

BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Coding12231040
BigCodeBench Instruct—29.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—40.6%

Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 22.5 (#177), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 18.7 (#254)

BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts12041028

Math Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 32.0 (#189), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 29.2 (#220)

BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Math12301089

Knowledge Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 31.3 (#213), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.3 (#251)

BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Expert1167984

Multilingual Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.3 (#236), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.4 (#280)

BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Non-English11811000
LMArena Chinese11791016
LMArena Russian11861004
LMArena French—1038
LMArena German—1006
LMArena Japanese—899
LMArena Korean—856
LMArena Spanish—1058

Instruction Following Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 63.2 (#228), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 52.1 (#289)

BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12011023

Long Context Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.5 (#225), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.3 (#284)

BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1205996

Writing & Preference Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 43.5 (#224), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.3 (#296)

BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Text12281050
LMArena Creative Writing12131024
LMArena Multi-Turn1227989

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.0 versus 28.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper