Noometry

Model comparison

Deepseek Coder v2 vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

Deepseek Coder v2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Deepseek Coder v2 DeepSeek

35.9

Rank #220 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct Microsoft

29.7

Rank #305 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Deepseek Coder v2 leads 38.2 to 27.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 59.7% for Deepseek Coder v2 and 40.6% for Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct.

Side by side

Deepseek Coder v2Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
ProviderDeepSeekMicrosoft
Noometry Index35.929.7
Released2024-06-172024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2419

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Deepseek Coder v2 leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 38.1 (#183), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)

BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
BigCodeBench Instruct48.2%29.6%
LMArena Coding12511039
BigCodeBench Complete59.7%40.6%
HumanEval+82.3%—
MBPP+75.1%—

Reasoning Deepseek Coder v2 leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 23.6 (#176), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)

BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts12071028
WinoGrande83.7%—

Math Deepseek Coder v2 leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 34.9 (#190), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)

BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Math12411089
GSM8K94.5%—

Knowledge Deepseek Coder v2 leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 32.3 (#212), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)

BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Expert1181984
ARC (AI2) Challenge64.3%—

Multilingual Deepseek Coder v2 leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 36.3 (#240), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)

BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Non-English11821000
LMArena Chinese12011016
LMArena French11851039
LMArena German11641006
LMArena Japanese1126899
LMArena Korean1104856
LMArena Russian11881004
LMArena Spanish11531059

Instruction Following Deepseek Coder v2 leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 61.7 (#242), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)

BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following11801023

Long Context Deepseek Coder v2 leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 37.0 (#224), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)

BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1219996

Writing & Preference Deepseek Coder v2 leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 38.2 (#253), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)

BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Text11911050
LMArena Creative Writing11201024
LMArena Multi-Turn1177989

Frequently asked questions

Is Deepseek Coder v2 better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

Deepseek Coder v2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Deepseek Coder v2 or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Deepseek Coder v2 and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Deepseek Coder v2 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper