Model comparison

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct vs Olmo 7b Instruct

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads 43.4 to 25.8.

Side by side

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct and Olmo 7b Instruct specifications
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructOlmo 7b Instruct
ProviderNVIDIAAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index35.930.3
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1210

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 35.6 (#222), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Coding12231016

Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 23.5 (#177), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts1203993

Math Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 34.6 (#193), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Math12301018

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 31.9 (#218), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Expert1167—

Multilingual Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.1 (#241), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Non-English1181977
LMArena Chinese11801014
LMArena Russian1187947

Instruction Following Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 62.9 (#233), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following1201978

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.5 (#230), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1205—

Writing & Preference Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 43.4 (#229), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Text12281032
LMArena Creative Writing1213990
LMArena Multi-Turn12271007

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct better than Olmo 7b Instruct?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.6 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct and Olmo 7b Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper