Model comparison
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b vs Olmo 7b Instruct
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. C4ai Aya Expanse 32b scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads 42.4 to 26.0.
Side by side
| C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Olmo 7b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 35.3 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2024-10-24 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 34.3 (#227), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1197 | 1016 |
Reasoning C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 22.3 (#183), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1193 | 993 |
Math C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 31.4 (#195), Olmo 7b Instruct: 27.8 (#234)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1200 | 1018 |
Knowledge Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 32.6 (#202), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1182 | — |
Multilingual C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 38.5 (#225), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.1 (#286)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1213 | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1210 | 1013 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 946 |
| LMArena French | 1247 | — |
| LMArena German | 1199 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1158 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1193 | — |
Instruction Following C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 62.9 (#232), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.3 (#296)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1196 | 978 |
Long Context Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 37.2 (#215), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1228 | — |
Writing & Preference C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 42.4 (#230), Olmo 7b Instruct: 26.0 (#298)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1224 | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1200 | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1190 | 1007 |
Frequently asked questions
Is C4ai Aya Expanse 32b better than Olmo 7b Instruct?
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is C4ai Aya Expanse 32b or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.3 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do C4ai Aya Expanse 32b and Olmo 7b Instruct share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. C4ai Aya Expanse 32b has 18 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.