Model comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct vs Mistral Small 3.2
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads 34.6 to 26.3.
Side by side
| Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Mistral Small 3.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 31.2 |
| Released | — | 2025-06-20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.0938 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 35.6 (#222), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1223 | — |
Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 23.5 (#177), Mistral Small 3.2: 18.1 (#287)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 40.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1203 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 131.74 |
Math Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 34.6 (#193), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.3 (#260)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 30.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1230 | — |
Knowledge Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 31.9 (#218), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.7 (#256)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 49.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1167 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.1 (#241), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1181 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1180 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1187 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 62.9 (#233), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1201 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.5 (#230), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1205 | — |
Writing & Preference Mistral Small 3.2 leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 43.4 (#229), Mistral Small 3.2: 45.0 (#224)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1228 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1213 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1255 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1227 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct better than Mistral Small 3.2?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct and Mistral Small 3.2 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.2 has 6.