Model comparison

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct vs Mistral Small 3

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI

31.2

Rank #278 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct scores higher in 4 categories and Mistral Small 3 in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads 34.6 to 16.3.

Side by side

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct and Mistral Small 3 specifications
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructMistral Small 3
ProviderNVIDIAMistral AI
Noometry Index35.931.2
Released—2025-01-30
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—33K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.05
Output $ / M tokens—$0.08
Results tracked1224

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 35.6 (#222), Mistral Small 3: 36.5 (#207)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructMistral Small 3
LMArena Coding12231246
BigCodeBench Instruct—45.3%
BigCodeBench Complete—50.4%

Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 23.5 (#177), Mistral Small 3: 18.9 (#273)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructMistral Small 3
LMArena Hard Prompts12031233
Chess Puzzles—0%
Epoch Capabilities Index—127.07

Math Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 34.6 (#193), Mistral Small 3: 16.3 (#295)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructMistral Small 3
LMArena Math12301240
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—6.7%

Knowledge Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 31.9 (#218), Mistral Small 3: 25.1 (#263)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructMistral Small 3
LMArena Expert11671202
GPQA Diamond—47.3%
Confabulations—25.2%

Multilingual Mistral Small 3 leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.1 (#241), Mistral Small 3: 37.3 (#236)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructMistral Small 3
LMArena Non-English11811198
LMArena Chinese11801204
LMArena Russian11871216
LMArena French—1203
LMArena German—1211
LMArena Japanese—1111
LMArena Korean—1188

Instruction Following Too close to call

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 62.9 (#233), Mistral Small 3: 63.7 (#229)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructMistral Small 3
LMArena Instruction Following12011214

Long Context Mistral Small 3 leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.5 (#230), Mistral Small 3: 37.8 (#211)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructMistral Small 3
LMArena Longer Query12051246

Writing & Preference Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 43.4 (#229), Mistral Small 3: 32.2 (#280)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructMistral Small 3
LMArena Text12281234
LMArena Creative Writing12131195
LMArena Multi-Turn12271217
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—707

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct better than Mistral Small 3?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct or Mistral Small 3 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (35.6 vs 36.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct and Mistral Small 3 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3 has 24.

Related comparisons

Go deeper