Model comparison

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct vs Mistral

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Mistral AI

29.4

Rank #297 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct scores higher in 8 categories and Mistral in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads 31.3 to 16.3.
  • Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct and Mistral specifications
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructMistral
ProviderNVIDIAMistral AI
Noometry Index35.229.4
Released——
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1222

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 35.0 (#219), Mistral: 33.2 (#249)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructMistral
LMArena Coding12231162

Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 22.5 (#177), Mistral: 21.3 (#199)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructMistral
LMArena Hard Prompts12041149

Math Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 32.0 (#189), Mistral: 20.5 (#275)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructMistral
LMArena Math12301180
Omni-MATH—7.2%

Knowledge Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 31.3 (#213), Mistral: 16.3 (#283)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructMistral
LMArena Expert11671125
MMLU-Pro—27.7%
GPQA (HELM)—30.3%

Multilingual Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.3 (#236), Mistral: 33.0 (#249)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructMistral
LMArena Non-English11811129
LMArena Chinese11791109
LMArena Russian11861168
LMArena French—1179
LMArena German—1155
LMArena Japanese—1012
LMArena Korean—1032
LMArena Spanish—1143

Instruction Following Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 63.2 (#228), Mistral: 52.9 (#283)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructMistral
LMArena Instruction Following12011152
IFEval—56.8%

Long Context Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.5 (#225), Mistral: 35.0 (#240)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructMistral
LMArena Longer Query12051154

Writing & Preference Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 43.5 (#224), Mistral: 37.2 (#255)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructMistral
LMArena Text12281165
LMArena Creative Writing12131158
LMArena Multi-Turn12271147
WildBench—66%

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct better than Mistral?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct or Mistral better for coding?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.0 versus 33.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct and Mistral share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and Mistral has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper