Model comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct vs Palm 2
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
GoogleSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct scores higher in 7 categories and Palm 2 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads 43.4 to 25.6.
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Palm 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 30.0 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 35.6 (#222), Palm 2: 29.0 (#311)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1223 | 994 |
Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 23.5 (#177), Palm 2: 19.1 (#271)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1203 | 1005 |
Math Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 34.6 (#193), Palm 2: 30.8 (#231)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1230 | 1049 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 31.9 (#218), Palm 2: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1167 | — |
Multilingual Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.1 (#241), Palm 2: 20.9 (#295)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1181 | 916 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1180 | 887 |
| LMArena Russian | 1187 | — |
Instruction Following Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 62.9 (#233), Palm 2: 51.0 (#296)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1201 | 1010 |
Long Context Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.5 (#230), Palm 2: 30.8 (#285)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1205 | 1010 |
Writing & Preference Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 43.4 (#229), Palm 2: 25.6 (#304)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1228 | 1027 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1213 | 991 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1227 | 994 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct better than Palm 2?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct or Palm 2 better for coding?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.6 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct and Palm 2 share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and Palm 2 has 10.