Noometry

Model comparison

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct vs MiMo-V2-Pro

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct NVIDIA

35.9

Rank #222 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Pro Xiaomi

43.0

Rank #103 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2-Pro in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.8 to 43.4.
  • Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructMiMo-V2-Pro
ProviderNVIDIAXiaomi
Noometry Index35.943.0
Released—2026-03-18
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.43
Output $ / M tokens—$0.87
Results tracked1223

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 35.6 (#222), MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)

BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Coding12231476
LMArena WebDev—1433
ALE-Bench—785.17

Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 23.5 (#177), MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)

BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts12031457
NYT Connections (extended)—25.8%
Thematic Generalization—45.9%

Math MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 34.6 (#193), MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)

BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Math12301447

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 31.9 (#218), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)

BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Expert11671478

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.1 (#241), MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)

BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Non-English11811416
LMArena Chinese11801456
LMArena Russian11871427
LMArena French—1469
LMArena German—1417
LMArena Japanese—1366
LMArena Korean—1400
LMArena Spanish—1457

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 62.9 (#233), MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)

BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following12011445

Long Context MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.5 (#230), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)

BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Longer Query12051455
CL-bench—15.7%
CL-bench Life—6.9%

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 43.4 (#229), MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)

BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 51b InstructMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Text12281436
LMArena Creative Writing12131415
LMArena Multi-Turn12271456

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct better than MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 35.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct and MiMo-V2-Pro share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper