Model comparison
Deepseek Coder v2 vs MiMo-V2-Pro
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeekSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2-Pro in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.8 to 38.2.
- Deepseek Coder v2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Deepseek Coder v2 | MiMo-V2-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 43.0 |
| Released | 2024-06-17 | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 38.1 (#183), MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1251 | 1476 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1433 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.7% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |
| HumanEval+ | 82.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 75.1% | — |
Reasoning Deepseek Coder v2 leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 23.6 (#176), MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1207 | 1457 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |
| WinoGrande | 83.7% | — |
Math MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 34.9 (#190), MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1241 | 1447 |
| GSM8K | 94.5% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 32.3 (#212), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1181 | 1478 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 64.3% | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 36.3 (#240), MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1182 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1201 | 1456 |
| LMArena French | 1185 | 1469 |
| LMArena German | 1164 | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1126 | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | 1104 | 1400 |
| LMArena Russian | 1188 | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1153 | 1457 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 61.7 (#242), MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1180 | 1445 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 37.0 (#224), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | 1455 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Deepseek Coder v2: 38.2 (#253), MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)
| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1191 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1120 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1177 | 1456 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Deepseek Coder v2 better than MiMo-V2-Pro?
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Deepseek Coder v2 or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 38.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Deepseek Coder v2 and MiMo-V2-Pro share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Deepseek Coder v2 has 24 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.