Model comparison
Llama 3.1-70B vs Qwen-7B
Llama 3.1-70B has enough public results to be ranked (#299); Qwen-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both.
Side by side
| Llama 3.1-70B | Qwen-7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | — |
| Released | 2024-07-23 | 2023-09-28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Results tracked | 35 | 8 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Llama 3.1-70B: 29.8 (#292), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1260 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 54.8% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 3.1-70B: 24.9 (#104), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 6.9% | — |
| BALROG | 27.9% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Llama 3.1-70B: 20.8 (#215), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.91 | 106.47 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1241 | — |
| DTBench | 60% | — |
| LMCA | 14.8% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 45% |
| LAMBADA | — | 67.9% |
| PIQA | — | 77.9% |
Math Not comparable
Llama 3.1-70B: 12.7 (#298), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 3.6% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 21% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1252 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 36.7% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 51.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama 3.1-70B: 24.1 (#264), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 80.1% | 45% |
| GPQA Diamond | 44.2% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 65.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 42.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1209 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 75.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 76.4% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 3.1-70B: 38.9 (#220), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1219 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1215 | — |
| LMArena French | 1260 | — |
| LMArena German | 1222 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1132 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1140 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1234 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1253 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 3.1-70B: 65.5 (#218), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 82.1% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1231 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 3.1-70B: 37.6 (#208), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1241 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 3.1-70B: 35.6 (#262), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1261 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1232 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 784 | — |
| WildBench | 75.8% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1256 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.1-70B better than Qwen-7B?
Llama 3.1-70B has enough public results to be ranked (#299); Qwen-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1-70B and Qwen-7B share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1-70B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-7B has 8.