Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs Qwen-7B

Claude 3 Opus has enough public results to be ranked (#300); Qwen-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus Anthropic

29.3

Rank #300 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both.
  • Qwen-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 Opus and Qwen-7B specifications
Claude 3 OpusQwen-7B
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.3—
Released2024-02-292023-09-28
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked468

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 32.4 (#261), Qwen-7B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusQwen-7B
WeirdML19.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct45.5%—
LiveBench Coding38.6%—
LMArena Coding1264—
BigCodeBench Complete57.4%—
HumanEval+77.4%—
MBPP+73.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 24.3 (#110), Qwen-7B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusQwen-7B
Cybench10%—
METR Time Horizons29.5%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 14.2 (#318), Qwen-7B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusQwen-7B
Epoch Capabilities Index126.91106.47
SimpleBench23.5%—
Chess Puzzles5%—
EnigmaEval0.8%—
LiveBench Reasoning40.6%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1246—
DTBench61.6%—
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%—
LMCA17%—
BIG-Bench Hard—45%
ForecastBench58.4—
LAMBADA—67.9%
LiveBench49.2%—
PIQA—77.9%
WinoGrande88.5%—

Math Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 13.9 (#293), Qwen-7B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusQwen-7B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.7%—
LiveBench Math43.6%—
LMArena Math1273—
MATH Level 537.5%—
GSM8K—51.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#262), Qwen-7B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusQwen-7B
MMLU84.6%45%
GPQA Diamond47.2%—
SimpleQA Verified12.6%—
Confabulations22.7%—
LMArena Expert1223—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—75.3%
BoolQ—76.4%

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 26.6 (#112), Qwen-7B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusQwen-7B
LMArena Vision1023—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 41.6 (#202), Qwen-7B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusQwen-7B
LMArena Non-English1258—
LMArena Chinese1248—
LMArena French1274—
LMArena German1258—
LMArena Japanese1204—
LMArena Korean1187—
LMArena Russian1280—
LMArena Spanish1246—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 64.3 (#223), Qwen-7B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusQwen-7B
LiveBench Instruction Following63.9%—
LMArena Instruction Following1248—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#197), Qwen-7B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusQwen-7B
LMArena Longer Query1259—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 47.4 (#208), Qwen-7B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusQwen-7B
LMArena Text1262—
LMArena Creative Writing1235—
LMArena Multi-Turn1275—
LiveBench Language50.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Opus better than Qwen-7B?

Claude 3 Opus has enough public results to be ranked (#300); Qwen-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Qwen-7B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-7B has 8.

Related comparisons

Go deeper