Model comparison

Llama 3.1-405B vs Yi-Lightning

Yi-Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.1-405B Meta

30.7

Rank #288 Confirmed

Yi-Lightning 01.AI

37.1

Rank #209 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1-405B scores higher in 1 category and Yi-Lightning in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Yi-Lightning leads 36.2 to 18.4.
  • Llama 3.1-405B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 3.1-405B and Yi-Lightning specifications
Llama 3.1-405BYi-Lightning
ProviderMeta01.AI
Noometry Index30.737.1
Released2024-07-232024-12-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4218

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Llama 3.1-405B leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 33.1 (#262), Yi-Lightning: 27.4 (#320)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BYi-Lightning
LMArena Coding12911312
Aider Polyglot—12.9%
WeirdML21.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3.1-405B: 21.0 (#140), Yi-Lightning: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BYi-Lightning
TheAgentCompany7.4%—
Cybench7.5%—

Reasoning Yi-Lightning leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 16.8 (#300), Yi-Lightning: 25.9 (#139)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BYi-Lightning
LMArena Hard Prompts12691302
SimpleBench23%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark45%—
DTBench61.4%—
BIG-Bench Hard82.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index128.75—
ForecastBench59.9—
HellaSwag89.2%—
PIQA85.9%—
WinoGrande89.2%—

Math Yi-Lightning leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 18.4 (#290), Yi-Lightning: 36.2 (#172)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BYi-Lightning
LMArena Math12811300
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20259.7%—
Omni-MATH24.9%—
MATH Level 549.8%—

Knowledge Yi-Lightning leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 30.4 (#227), Yi-Lightning: 35.4 (#185)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BYi-Lightning
LMArena Expert12431286
GPQA Diamond50.9%—
MMLU-Pro72.3%—
Confabulations17.6%—
GPQA (HELM)52.2%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge95.3%—
MMLU84.5%—
TriviaQA82.7%—

Multilingual Yi-Lightning leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 40.7 (#214), Yi-Lightning: 42.2 (#196)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BYi-Lightning
LMArena Non-English12481269
LMArena Chinese12421320
LMArena French12791305
LMArena German12521267
LMArena Japanese12081228
LMArena Korean11841192
LMArena Russian12651255
LMArena Spanish12601315

Instruction Following Yi-Lightning leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 65.9 (#214), Yi-Lightning: 67.4 (#196)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BYi-Lightning
LMArena Instruction Following12591278
IFEval81.1%—

Long Context Too close to call

Llama 3.1-405B: 38.4 (#197), Yi-Lightning: 39.4 (#181)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BYi-Lightning
LMArena Longer Query12661297

Writing & Preference Yi-Lightning leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 38.9 (#251), Yi-Lightning: 50.2 (#184)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BYi-Lightning
LMArena Text12841302
LMArena Creative Writing12621280
LMArena Multi-Turn12971311
EQ-Bench Creative Writing870—
WildBench78.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.1-405B better than Yi-Lightning?

Yi-Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3.1-405B or Yi-Lightning better for coding?

Llama 3.1-405B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.1 versus 27.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1-405B and Yi-Lightning share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1-405B has 42 scored results on Noometry and Yi-Lightning has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper