Model comparison

Llama 3.1-405B vs Qwen Plus

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.1-405B Meta

30.7

Rank #288 Confirmed

Qwen Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

37.1

Rank #210 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1-405B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen Plus in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen Plus leads 52.2 to 38.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 61.4% for Llama 3.1-405B and 81.1% for Qwen Plus.
  • Llama 3.1-405B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 3.1-405B and Qwen Plus specifications
Llama 3.1-405BQwen Plus
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.737.1
Released2024-07-232024-01-25
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—33K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked4220

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen Plus leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 33.1 (#262), Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen Plus
LMArena Coding12911328
WeirdML21.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3.1-405B: 21.0 (#140), Qwen Plus: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen Plus
TheAgentCompany7.4%—
Cybench7.5%—

Reasoning Qwen Plus leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 16.8 (#300), Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen Plus
Kagi LLM Benchmark45%63.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts12691317
DTBench61.4%81.1%
SimpleBench23%—
LMCA—24%
BIG-Bench Hard82.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index128.75—
ForecastBench59.9—
HellaSwag89.2%—
PIQA85.9%—
WinoGrande89.2%—

Math Qwen Plus leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 18.4 (#290), Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen Plus
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20259.7%17.8%
LMArena Math12811326
MATH Level 549.8%65.3%
Omni-MATH24.9%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1.7%

Knowledge Llama 3.1-405B leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 30.4 (#227), Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen Plus
GPQA Diamond50.9%48.1%
LMArena Expert12431328
MMLU-Pro72.3%—
Confabulations17.6%—
GPQA (HELM)52.2%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge95.3%—
MMLU84.5%—
TriviaQA82.7%—

Multilingual Qwen Plus leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 40.7 (#214), Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen Plus
LMArena Non-English12481310
LMArena Chinese12421347
LMArena Japanese12081251
LMArena Russian12651323
LMArena French1279—
LMArena German1252—
LMArena Korean1184—
LMArena Spanish1260—

Instruction Following Qwen Plus leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 65.9 (#214), Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen Plus
LMArena Instruction Following12591303
IFEval81.1%—

Long Context Qwen Plus leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 38.4 (#197), Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen Plus
LMArena Longer Query12661324

Writing & Preference Qwen Plus leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 38.9 (#251), Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen Plus
LMArena Text12841326
LMArena Creative Writing12621293
LMArena Multi-Turn12971336
EQ-Bench Creative Writing870—
WildBench78.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.1-405B better than Qwen Plus?

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3.1-405B or Qwen Plus better for coding?

Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 33.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1-405B and Qwen Plus share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1-405B has 42 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper