Model comparison

Llama 3.1-405B vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.1-405B Meta

30.7

Rank #288 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1-405B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads 37.6 to 18.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 21.4% for Llama 3.1-405B and 41.2% for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct.

Side by side

Llama 3.1-405B and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct specifications
Llama 3.1-405BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.738.1
Released2024-07-232025-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked4225

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 33.1 (#262), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 35.5 (#223)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
WeirdML21.4%41.2%
LMArena Coding12911412
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—55.4%
LMArena WebDev—1275
GSO—4.9%
ALE-Bench—461.45
AlgoTune—1.44

Agentic & Tool Use Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 21.0 (#140), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.9 (#123)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Terminal-Bench—27.2%
TheAgentCompany7.4%—
Cybench7.5%—

Reasoning Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 16.8 (#300), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 25.5 (#149)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Kagi LLM Benchmark45%49.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts12691372
SimpleBench23%—
DTBench61.4%—
BIG-Bench Hard82.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index128.75—
ForecastBench59.9—
HellaSwag89.2%—
PIQA85.9%—
WinoGrande89.2%—

Math Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 18.4 (#290), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.6 (#150)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Math12811365
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20259.7%—
Omni-MATH24.9%—
MATH Level 549.8%—

Knowledge Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 30.4 (#227), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.0 (#162)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Expert12431338
GPQA Diamond50.9%—
MMLU-Pro72.3%—
Confabulations17.6%—
GPQA (HELM)52.2%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge95.3%—
MMLU84.5%—
TriviaQA82.7%—

Multilingual Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 40.7 (#214), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.7 (#148)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Non-English12481346
LMArena Chinese12421357
LMArena French12791398
LMArena German12521325
LMArena Japanese12081310
LMArena Korean11841305
LMArena Russian12651366
LMArena Spanish12601360

Instruction Following Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 65.9 (#214), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.6 (#147)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12591355
IFEval81.1%—

Long Context Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 38.4 (#197), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#131)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query12661378

Writing & Preference Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 38.9 (#251), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.3 (#147)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Text12841357
LMArena Creative Writing12621333
LMArena Multi-Turn12971365
EQ-Bench Creative Writing870—
WildBench78.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.1-405B better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3.1-405B or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.5 versus 33.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1-405B and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1-405B has 42 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper