Model comparison

Llama 3.1-405B vs Muse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.1-405B Meta

30.7

Rank #288 Confirmed

Muse Spark 1.3 Meta

54.8

Rank #27 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1-405B scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.3 in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Muse Spark 1.3 leads 73.1 to 18.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 9.7% for Llama 3.1-405B and 99.2% for Muse Spark 1.3.
  • Llama 3.1-405B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 3.1-405B and Muse Spark 1.3 specifications
Llama 3.1-405BMuse Spark 1.3
ProviderMetaMeta
Noometry Index30.754.8
Released2024-07-232026-09-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked4237

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 33.1 (#262), Muse Spark 1.3: 56.6 (#21)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Coding12911514
CursorBench—41.6%
LMArena WebDev—1657
SciCode—59.7%
WeirdML21.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 21.0 (#140), Muse Spark 1.3: 38.6 (#30)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMuse Spark 1.3
APEX-Agents—57.8%
TheAgentCompany7.4%—
Cybench7.5%—
GDP.pdf—27.6%

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 16.8 (#300), Muse Spark 1.3: 54.0 (#27)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Hard Prompts12691503
DTBench61.4%96.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index128.75156.75
SimpleBench23%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark45%—
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
CritPt—26%
Chess Puzzles—38%
Mystery Game Puzzles—25%
LMCA—53.9%
Bench to the Future 3—0.14
BIG-Bench Hard82.9%—
ForecastBench59.9—
HellaSwag89.2%—
PIQA85.9%—
WinoGrande89.2%—

Math Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 18.4 (#290), Muse Spark 1.3: 73.1 (#21)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMuse Spark 1.3
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20259.7%99.2%
LMArena Math12811494
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4—46.3%
ProofBench—58%
Omni-MATH24.9%—
MATH Level 549.8%—

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 30.4 (#227), Muse Spark 1.3: 42.6 (#95)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Expert12431516
GPQA Diamond50.9%—
MMLU-Pro72.3%—
Confabulations17.6%—
GPQA (HELM)52.2%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge95.3%—
MMLU84.5%—
TriviaQA82.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 3.1-405B: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 43.7 (#22)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision—1309
LMArena Document—1471

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 40.7 (#214), Muse Spark 1.3: 57.4 (#8)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Non-English12481481
LMArena Chinese12421529
LMArena French12791524
LMArena German12521515
LMArena Japanese12081474
LMArena Korean11841501
LMArena Russian12651490
LMArena Spanish12601490

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 65.9 (#214), Muse Spark 1.3: 77.5 (#22)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Instruction Following12591477
IFEval81.1%—

Long Context Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 38.4 (#197), Muse Spark 1.3: 45.6 (#32)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Longer Query12661488

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 38.9 (#251), Muse Spark 1.3: 73.6 (#9)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text12841490
LMArena Creative Writing12621455
EQ-Bench Creative Writing8701906
LMArena Multi-Turn12971482
WildBench78.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.1-405B better than Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3.1-405B or Muse Spark 1.3 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.6 versus 33.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1-405B and Muse Spark 1.3 share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1-405B has 42 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.3 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper