Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Yi-1.5-34B

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.4 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.3 Meta

54.4

Rank #27 Confirmed

Yi-1.5-34B 01.AI

30.2

Rank #286 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Muse Spark 1.3 leads 72.4 to 25.3.
  • Yi-1.5-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.3 and Yi-1.5-34B specifications
Muse Spark 1.3Yi-1.5-34B
ProviderMeta01.AI
Noometry Index54.430.2
Released2026-09-022024-05-13
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$4.25—
Results tracked3421

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 56.1 (#18), Yi-1.5-34B: 31.9 (#267)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Coding15161169
CursorBench41.6%—
LMArena WebDev1655—
SciCode59.7%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—33.9%
BigCodeBench Complete—43.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 38.6 (#28), Yi-1.5-34B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Yi-1.5-34B
APEX-Agents57.8%—
GDP.pdf27.6%—

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 52.9 (#27), Yi-1.5-34B: 21.5 (#195)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts15031160
NYT Connections (extended)85.1%—
CritPt24.9%—
Chess Puzzles38%—
Mystery Game Puzzles25%—
DTBench96.5%—
LMCA53.9%—
Bench to the Future 30.14—
Epoch Capabilities Index156.89—

Math Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 72.4 (#16), Yi-1.5-34B: 25.3 (#248)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Math14971182
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)74.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 446.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202599.2%—
MATH Level 5—25.5%

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 42.0 (#92), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#290)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Expert15161144
GPQA Diamond—32%

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 43.0 (#21), Yi-1.5-34B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Vision1310—
LMArena Document1471—

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 57.8 (#6), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.5 (#251)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Non-English14851121
LMArena Chinese15271213
LMArena French15341155
LMArena Korean15131005
LMArena Russian14911091
LMArena Spanish14851120
LMArena German—1111
LMArena Japanese—1021

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 77.8 (#14), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.4 (#252)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Instruction Following14811139

Long Context Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 45.7 (#29), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#243)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Longer Query14911144

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 73.7 (#10), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.6 (#252)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Text14901173
LMArena Creative Writing14501135
LMArena Multi-Turn14861153
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1906—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.3 better than Yi-1.5-34B?

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.4 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark 1.3 or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.1 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.3 and Yi-1.5-34B share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.3 has 34 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper