Model comparison

Llama 3.1-405B vs Ministral 8B

Llama 3.1-405B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.7 to 28.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.1-405B Meta

30.7

Rank #288 Confirmed

Ministral 8B Mistral AI

28.2

Rank #325 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1-405B scores higher in 5 categories and Ministral 8B in 4 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Llama 3.1-405B leads 30.4 to 12.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 49.8% for Llama 3.1-405B and 14.9% for Ministral 8B.

Side by side

Llama 3.1-405B and Ministral 8B specifications
Llama 3.1-405BMinistral 8B
ProviderMetaMistral AI
Noometry Index30.728.2
Released2024-07-232024-10-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.15
Output $ / M tokens—$0.15
Results tracked4217

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Ministral 8B leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 33.1 (#262), Ministral 8B: 35.0 (#230)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMinistral 8B
LMArena Coding12911202
WeirdML21.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Llama 3.1-405B leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 21.0 (#140), Ministral 8B: 16.4 (#148)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMinistral 8B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—11.1%
TheAgentCompany7.4%—
Cybench7.5%—

Reasoning Ministral 8B leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 16.8 (#300), Ministral 8B: 18.4 (#281)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMinistral 8B
LMArena Hard Prompts12691191
DTBench61.4%45.7%
SimpleBench23%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark45%—
BIG-Bench Hard82.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index128.75—
ForecastBench59.9—
HellaSwag89.2%—
PIQA85.9%—
WinoGrande89.2%—

Math Ministral 8B leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 18.4 (#290), Ministral 8B: 25.7 (#267)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMinistral 8B
LMArena Math12811188
MATH Level 549.8%14.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20259.7%—
Omni-MATH24.9%—

Knowledge Llama 3.1-405B leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 30.4 (#227), Ministral 8B: 12.6 (#297)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMinistral 8B
GPQA Diamond50.9%27.1%
LMArena Expert12431170
MMLU-Pro72.3%—
Confabulations17.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—7.4%
GPQA (HELM)52.2%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge95.3%—
MMLU84.5%—
TriviaQA82.7%—

Multilingual Llama 3.1-405B leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 40.7 (#214), Ministral 8B: 35.1 (#247)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMinistral 8B
LMArena Non-English12481165
LMArena Chinese12421193
LMArena Russian12651195
LMArena French1279—
LMArena German1252—
LMArena Japanese1208—
LMArena Korean1184—
LMArena Spanish1260—

Instruction Following Llama 3.1-405B leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 65.9 (#214), Ministral 8B: 60.5 (#250)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMinistral 8B
LMArena Instruction Following12591161
IFEval81.1%—

Long Context Llama 3.1-405B leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 38.4 (#197), Ministral 8B: 36.7 (#227)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMinistral 8B
LMArena Longer Query12661212

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Llama 3.1-405B: 38.9 (#251), Ministral 8B: 39.6 (#246)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BMinistral 8B
LMArena Text12841191
LMArena Creative Writing12621175
LMArena Multi-Turn12971166
EQ-Bench Creative Writing870—
WildBench78.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.1-405B better than Ministral 8B?

Llama 3.1-405B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.7 to 28.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3.1-405B or Ministral 8B better for coding?

Ministral 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.0 versus 33.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1-405B and Ministral 8B share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1-405B has 42 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 8B has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper