Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs MiMo-V2-Pro

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 34b Instruct Meta

30.8

Rank #287 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Pro Xiaomi

43.0

Rank #103 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.8 to 28.2.
  • Codellama 34b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Codellama 34b Instruct and MiMo-V2-Pro specifications
Codellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2-Pro
ProviderMetaXiaomi
Noometry Index30.843.0
Released—2026-03-18
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.43
Output $ / M tokens—$0.87
Results tracked1423

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Coding10461476
LMArena WebDev—1433
BigCodeBench Instruct29%—
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%—
ALE-Bench—785.17
HumanEval+43.9%—
MBPP+56.3%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts10321457
NYT Connections (extended)—25.8%
Thematic Generalization—45.9%

Math MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Math10561447

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Expert—1478

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Non-English10111416
LMArena Chinese9761456
LMArena French—1469
LMArena German—1417
LMArena Japanese—1366
LMArena Korean—1400
LMArena Russian—1427
LMArena Spanish—1457

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following10281445

Long Context MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Longer Query10131455
CL-bench—15.7%
CL-bench Life—6.9%

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Text10661436
LMArena Creative Writing10321415
LMArena Multi-Turn10151456

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 34b Instruct or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and MiMo-V2-Pro share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper