Model comparison
Llama 2-7B vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-7B scores higher in 2 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads 45.6 to 28.0.
Side by side
| Llama 2-7B | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 33.0 |
| Released | 2023-07-18 | 2024-11-21 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 29 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads
Llama 2-7B: 29.2 (#307), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 36.0 (#214)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1002 | 1235 |
Reasoning Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads
Llama 2-7B: 15.7 (#312), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 23.9 (#169)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1009 | 1220 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 39.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 99.06 | — |
| HellaSwag | 77.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 73.3% | — |
| PIQA | 78.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 69.2% | — |
Math Llama 2-7B leads
Llama 2-7B: 30.7 (#233), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 14.2 (#303)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1042 | 1242 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 4.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 42.7% |
| GSM8K | 16.7% | — |
Knowledge Llama 2-7B leads
Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#248), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1036 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 45.9% | — |
| BoolQ | 77.9% | — |
| MMLU | 45.8% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 58.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 2-7B: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.1% | — |
Multilingual Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads
Llama 2-7B: 23.8 (#293), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 39.9 (#222)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 973 | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | 973 | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | 995 | 1246 |
| LMArena French | 970 | — |
| LMArena German | 978 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1007 | — |
Instruction Following Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads
Llama 2-7B: 50.8 (#298), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 64.8 (#227)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1006 | 1233 |
Long Context Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads
Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#287), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#222)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 999 | 1224 |
Writing & Preference Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads
Llama 2-7B: 28.0 (#298), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.6 (#223)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1053 | 1256 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1033 | 1231 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1029 | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 2-7B better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?
Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 2-7B or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?
Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.0 versus 29.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 2-7B and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-7B has 29 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.