Model comparison
Llama 2-7B vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.1 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-7B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Max Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads 64.0 to 28.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 0% for Llama 2-7B and 20% for Qwen3.6 Max Preview.
- Llama 2-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Llama 2-7B | Qwen3.6 Max Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 28.6 | 51.1 |
| Released | 2023-07-18 | 2026-04-20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $7.80 |
| Results tracked | 29 | 29 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
Llama 2-7B: 28.7 (#302), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 48.6 (#50)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1002 | 1472 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 76.7% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1482 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 2-7B: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 4,254 |
Reasoning Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
Llama 2-7B: 15.1 (#309), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 40.8 (#47)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 20% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1009 | 1457 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 98.54 | 149.27 |
| SimpleBench | — | 63% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.1% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 19% |
| DTBench | — | 87.2% |
| LMCA | — | 42.5% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 39.2% | — |
| HellaSwag | 77.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 73.3% | — |
| PIQA | 78.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 69.2% | — |
Math Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#231), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 52.2 (#40)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1042 | 1465 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 91.1% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 23.1% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 4.2% |
| GSM8K | 16.7% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
Llama 2-7B: 27.7 (#243), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 57.6 (#35)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1036 | 1476 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 52% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 45.9% | — |
| BoolQ | 77.9% | — |
| MMLU | 45.8% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 58.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 2-7B: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.1% | — |
Multilingual Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
Llama 2-7B: 23.9 (#288), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.3 (#46)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 973 | 1436 |
| LMArena Chinese | 973 | 1487 |
| LMArena French | 969 | 1449 |
| LMArena Russian | 995 | 1444 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1007 | 1452 |
| LMArena German | 978 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
Llama 2-7B: 51.0 (#293), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 75.8 (#51)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1006 | 1437 |
Long Context Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#282), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 44.6 (#59)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 999 | 1457 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
Llama 2-7B: 28.1 (#293), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 64.0 (#58)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1053 | 1447 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1033 | 1435 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1029 | 1456 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 2-7B better than Qwen3.6 Max Preview?
Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.1 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 2-7B or Qwen3.6 Max Preview better for coding?
Qwen3.6 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 28.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 2-7B and Qwen3.6 Max Preview share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-7B has 29 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Max Preview has 29.