Model comparison

Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 1.1 2b IT Google

29.3

Rank #313 Confirmed

Qwen3.6 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

51.5

Rank #43 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Max Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads 63.8 to 25.1.
  • Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Qwen3.6 Max Preview specifications
Gemma 1.1 2b ITQwen3.6 Max Preview
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.351.5
Released—2026-04-20
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.30
Output $ / M tokens—$7.80
Results tracked1629

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 48.7 (#54)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Coding10341471
SWE-bench Verified—76.7%
LMArena WebDev—1482
HumanEval+17.7%—
MBPP+23.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITQwen3.6 Max Preview
Vending-Bench 2—4,254

Reasoning Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 41.7 (#53)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts10051457
SimpleBench—63%
NYT Connections (extended)—74.1%
Chess Puzzles—20%
Mystery Game Puzzles—19%
DTBench—87.2%
LMCA—42.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—149.24

Math Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.1 (#46)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Math10471465
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—91.1%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—23.1%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—4.2%

Knowledge Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 57.6 (#39)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Expert9701478
GPQA Diamond—87.4%
SimpleQA Verified—52%

Multilingual Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.2 (#48)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Non-English9881437
LMArena Chinese10121487
LMArena Russian9901445
LMArena French—1449
LMArena German944—
LMArena Korean899—
LMArena Spanish—1454

Instruction Following Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 75.7 (#55)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Instruction Following9921438

Long Context Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 44.6 (#61)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Longer Query10031457

Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 63.8 (#60)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Text10221447
LMArena Creative Writing9981435
LMArena Multi-Turn9591456

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Qwen3.6 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.7 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Qwen3.6 Max Preview share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Max Preview has 29.

Related comparisons

Go deeper