Model comparison
Llama 2-70B vs Qwen3.6 Plus
Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-70B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Plus in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Plus leads 56.1 to 7.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 0% for Llama 2-70B and 93.3% for Qwen3.6 Plus.
- Llama 2-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Llama 2-70B | Qwen3.6 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 24.4 | 47.5 |
| Released | 2023-07-18 | 2026-03-31 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $3 |
| Results tracked | 35 | 37 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.6 Plus leads
Llama 2-70B: 31.4 (#286), Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.8 (#130)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1079 | 1467 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 57.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1461 |
| SciCode | — | 40.7% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 670.15 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 2-70B: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,115 |
Reasoning Qwen3.6 Plus leads
Llama 2-70B: 14.4 (#325), Qwen3.6 Plus: 29.3 (#93)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1073 | 1449 |
| DTBench | 41.6% | 81.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 113.79 | 147.65 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 60.3% |
| CritPt | — | 2.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 17% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 59.5% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 12% |
| LMCA | — | 33.1% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 64.9% | — |
| CommonsenseQA 2.0 | 50% | — |
| ForecastBench | 51.4 | — |
| HellaSwag | 85.3% | — |
| LAMBADA | 78.9% | — |
| PIQA | 82.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 80.2% | — |
Math Qwen3.6 Plus leads
Llama 2-70B: 8.1 (#326), Qwen3.6 Plus: 51.8 (#54)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0% | 93.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1091 | 1450 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 38.2% |
| MATH Level 5 | 3.3% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 26.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 8.3% |
| GSM8K | 69.6% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.6 Plus leads
Llama 2-70B: 7.4 (#310), Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#45)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 26.3% | 88.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1039 | 1454 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 44.1% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 88.6% | — |
| MMLU | 69.9% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 60.2% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.6% | — |
Multilingual Qwen3.6 Plus leads
Llama 2-70B: 27.7 (#274), Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.3 (#70)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1045 | 1424 |
| LMArena Chinese | 995 | 1477 |
| LMArena French | 1090 | 1455 |
| LMArena German | 1041 | 1452 |
| LMArena Japanese | 927 | 1389 |
| LMArena Korean | 964 | 1379 |
| LMArena Russian | 1083 | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1143 | 1432 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.6 Plus leads
Llama 2-70B: 54.9 (#278), Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.0 (#74)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1071 | 1425 |
Long Context Qwen3.6 Plus leads
Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#270), Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.2 (#49)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1062 | 1439 |
| CL-bench | — | 20.3% |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 Plus leads
Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#279), Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.2 (#82)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1115 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1075 | 1404 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1088 | 1438 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 2-70B better than Qwen3.6 Plus?
Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 2-70B or Qwen3.6 Plus better for coding?
Qwen3.6 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 2-70B and Qwen3.6 Plus share?
21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-70B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Plus has 37.